New Mandala

New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia

New Mandala random header image

Ji Ungpakorn on the abolition of lèse majesté

May 3rd, 2008 by Andrew Walker · 7 Comments

Time to abolish the lèse majesté law in Thailand
Giles Ji Ungpakorn
Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok

Once again we are seeing the extreme Right in Thailand using lèse majesté as an excuse to encourage acts of violence against those who stand up for freedom and justice. Thirty years ago, agitation by the extreme Right, through such media outlets as the Tank Corps radio station and Dao Sayam newspaper, resulted in the upmost barbarism at Thammasart University on the 6th October 1976. Therefore the recent swearing of an oath of allegiance to “Nation Religion and King” by the so-called Peoples Alliance for Democracy at Thammasart, is tantamount to spitting on the memories of those who died and suffered in the bloody events of the 6th October.

Most recently we see The Manager, the media outlet of big businessman Sonti Limtongkul, opening its web-pages to Right-Wing thugs who want to encourage violence against Chotisak Onsoong because he chose to think differently and not stand for the King’s song in the cinema. Following this there have been threats of violence, also posted on The Manager website, against Jittra Kotchadej, Chairwoman of the Triumph textile workers union. Her supposed “crime” was to wear a T-shirt supporting Chotisak’s freedom of expression. In both cases, their addresses have been published by The Manager. The actions by The Manager are not only illegal in that they encourage violence against others, but they are also a serious obstacle to basic rights and democracy. I call on everyone in the Peoples’ Movement to condemn this despicable media outlet and its Right-Wing owner.

We should not be surprised at the behaviour of The Manager. After all they supported the 19th September coup which destroyed democracy and claimed legitimacy from the Palace. Sonti Limtongkul has never been on the side of freedom, democracy and the Peoples’ Movement. But the important question to ask is …. will Somsak Kosaisuk, Pipop Tongchai, Somkiat Pongpaiboon and Suriyasai Takasila have enough basic democratic principles to come out and condemn The Manager? Given their close alliance with Sonti and his media, staying quiet will be the same as condoning these disgusting actions. I still hope that they will have some principles left, but my hopes are rapidly fading.

On May Day this year, Somsak Kosaisuk, who used to be someone I admired, made a statement on behalf of the Workers Solidarity Committee, that workers should unite to fight the capitalists. I agree with his statement. But does Somsak oppose all capitalists? Or will he still build alliances with non-Thaksin ones? And in his so-called struggle against capitalism will he defend “Nation Religion and King”, the slogan of the extreme Right who are the sworn enemies and murderers of students, workers and farmers? Pipop Tongchai had the unfortunate experience of seeing his bookshop burnt down by Right-Wing thugs on the 6th October. Will he still maintain, as he did a few years ago at Chula, that he must continue to build an alliance with conservative monarchists?

The fact that lèse majesté is an excuse to silence and use violence against those who think differently is merely one of many reasons why the law should be abolished.

The second reason to abolish lèse majesté, as a matter of urgency, is that it is an authoritarian law of the type found in countries with Absolute Monarchies. No modern civilised and democratic nation in the world maintains such a law. If we are to have democracy we must have the right to express ourselves. There must be the right to criticise the Monarchy. Otherwise the Monarch or members of the Royal Family can behave as they like without any accountability or transparency. Lèse majesté laws actually indicate that the Conservatives are afraid that if they allow criticism we shall see that many many Thais have different opinions. The constructed image of the Monarchy will also face serious scrutiny. In other words, the Conservatives are afraid of the truth. If not, why not dare to abolish lèse majesté? I am not afraid myself to face the fact that most Thais at present love and respect the King. Why are the ruling class so afraid? Or is it really about the need by factions of the elite, whether it be the military or the capitalists, to use lèse majesté to attack their opponents for their own narrow personal gain? This is an important question that we must all ask. The 19th September coup claimed Royal legitimacy, but did this coup take place in order to strengthen the Monarchy or in order that one faction of the ruling elite could beat Thaksin? No one can really deny that lèse majesté is a political tool in numerous faction fights between those who all claim to support the Monarchy. This is another reason to abolish the law.

Apart from the right to criticise the Monarchy, in a democratic society we must have the right to propose new forms of society. It must not be a “crime” to advocate a Republic in Thailand. Republics exist in most modern and civilised nations of the world. But whether or not to have a republic must be the decision of the Thai people after free debate.

Thailand actually has a long tradition of differing views concerning the Monarchy. Under feudalism the serfs made great efforts to avoid Royal conscripted labour and the ruling elites would often kill kings in order to take power themselves. Under the Absolute Monarchies of Rama 5-7, nobles, civil servants, workers and farmers often showed their displeasure at the centralisation of power or the inefficiency of the King’s rule. This ended with the 1932 Revolution. In the period when the Communist Party of Thailand had much influence, many Thais wanted a Republic. These are historical facts. So let us not believe the rubbish that all Thais have been Royalists throughout history.

Whether a Thai citizen uses Scientific or Buddhist philosophy, the common factor here is that respect and admiration should come from reason. We must be free to think for ourselves. It is not possible to force someone to respect anything sincerely. Therefore Chotisak’s and many other people’s decisions not to stand in the cinema are perfectly natural and legitimate. But if the Thai elite need to use a law to enforce respect that means that they are afraid that Thais can actually think for themselves! Lèse majesté is an obstacle to reasoned free-thinking among Thais. It is high time it was abolished.

Tags: Thailand

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Abolish lèse majesté-Giles Ji Ungphakorn « FACT - Freedom Against Censorship Thailand // May 4, 2008 at 12:51 am

    [...] Time to abolish the lèse majesté law in Thailand Giles Ji Ungpakorn, Chulalongkorn [...]

  • 2 tUM|BleR // May 4, 2008 at 1:27 am

    No longer is the Manager an (admittedly) honourable anti-Thaksin force of three years ago. Instead we now have a crazy evil bunch of people keen to incite violence against their opponents just like what the BNP does in Britain. A lot of people have worked so hard to prevent this country from descending into bloodshed, but Sondhi and co seem to be having none of it.

  • 3 k2h // May 4, 2008 at 8:54 am

    It is high time the LM law was abolished. Nepal is a superb example, isn’t it?

  • 4 Chester Garil // May 4, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    Is the NLM guilty of LM for publishing what the local rags probably wouldn’t touch with a bargepole? Rarely have I seen such a telling comment from a foreign newspaper. Mind you, we only have NLM and the Junta’s word for it:
    http://www.angkor.com/2bangkok/2bangkok/forum/showpost.php?p=20914&postcount=207

  • 5 Johpa // May 5, 2008 at 2:46 am

    Wow, all I can say after reading Achaan Ungpakorn’s essay is “Chaiyo”!

    I also hope he is watching his back.

  • 6 Autonomist // May 8, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    I hope soon or later, all Thai people would open their eyes and stand up for themselves.

  • 7 Khun Stillwater // May 10, 2008 at 4:24 am

    Prof. Ungpakorn must have his eyes and ears closed.

    Those people who acted violently and obscenely against a peaceful Pantamit gathering at Thammasat…were supporters of Thaksin.

    Pantamit still advocates peaceful demonstrations within legal guidelines.

    For someone who can read Thai, Prof. Ungpakorn failed to point out some “minor” details to the western audience here: Manager was in no way the first media outlet to cover the Chotsak issue.

    Although I agree that les majeste needs to be removed from the constitution I find it suspect that this is happening right now in the middle of the Thaksin’s attempt to return to power.

    My greatest fear is that sooner or later respected academics like Prof. Ungpakorn who would like to see “free debate” may end up backing people like Chakrapop Penkair who would LOVE to see the end of Prem’s rule and the monarchy.

    Believe me if these academics side with Thaksin and Chakrapop—they’ll soon deal with a sakdina more powerful, more absolute and more manipulative than ever.

    Good luck to Chotsak’s efforts—but most Thais will not side with him. That’s the reality.

    The monarchy manipulates, just as the people, if clever enough can manipulate the monarchy—a majority will choose to be pro-royalist to defeat what they feel is a great evil : Thaksin.

Leave a Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>