Australia has been caught up in Thailand’s Valentine’s Day moral panic about adolescant sexuality. The Sydney Morning Herald reports on disturbing developments at Sydney’s Taronga Park Zoo:
Taronga Zoo’s Thong Dee, the Thai elephant cow found to be five months pregnant this week, seemed a good deal calmer yesterday than the humans fiercely debating her welfare. Environmental groups say Thong Dee, who is aged either eight or nine, is too young to be breeding and her pregnancy points to serious mismanagement by zoo staff. The NSW Greens are urging the federal Environment Minister, Peter Garrett, to put the case before the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions, saying the zoo has breached its guidelines. A spokeswoman for Mr Garrett said the Department of Environment had asked the zoo for information about Thong Dee. The zoo maintains that expert zoological advice, sought early last year, found her perfectly ready to have babies, and believes she is already nine, regarded by many sources as the minimum breeding age. An international elephant tracking website says Thong Dee was born in 2000, making her eight this year. A 2004 report produced by the Proboscid and Perissodactyl Taxon Advisory Group said: “Elephants for breeding must be at least nine years old (12 years is ideal)”. The management plan adopted by the zoo says 11 is the best breeding age. But advice from the reproductive biologist Dr Thomas Hildebrandt, received early last year, supersedes the original breeding instructions accepted by the zoo, said a spokesman for Taronga, Mark Williams.
Thank god for the Greens. And all strength to the arm of the Proboscid and Perissodactyl Taxon Advisory Group. New Mandala will be following this closely, until the randy bull responsible is bought to justice! The following identikit image has been prepared to assist in investigations.











5 responses so far ↓
1 littlebang // Feb 15, 2008 at 8:33 pm
Well, if you are pregnant you are Pben Thong. i.e. Thong = belly.
Therefore the elephant is indeed Thong dee
2 Srithanonchai // Feb 16, 2008 at 12:32 am
They obviously resisted being elephantosubjected by following their own elephanto constitution!
3 jonfernquest // Feb 16, 2008 at 3:35 pm
Seems like a normal healthy elephant. People got all upset when my little Shih Tzu Nong Fah had five puppies at nine months. Even called her “rat” which I guess means “promiscuous” in Thai, though I never looked it up in the dictionary.
4 Michael Angel // Feb 21, 2008 at 1:53 pm
I think your blistering Editorial opinion (page 34) summed it all up.
All right thinking people will be with you on this.
But where is the Family First Party or Fred Nile on this?
Are we to leave the morals of the county in the garden-soiled hands of the Tree Huggrers?!
Your salacious and gratuitous photograph did not improve matters. Have you heard from the press council yet? I hope they take you to task - severely. There should have been an R18+ warning somewhere. Not only the morals but the journalistic standards of the country are in free fall!
We knew this would happen once Labor was in power.
Then, I am sympathetic to Mike Carlton’s comment.
“How do you come between an elephant and its libido?”
5 pallop pinkmanee // Jun 20, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Pity poor elephants who are at the mercy (or mercilessness) of those humans who think of themselves as being oh so superior!
Leave a Comment