
Regular New Mandala reader Michele Legge contributes this insight into ongoing displacement in Cambodia. A good reminder of the importance of maintaining a focus on the poor and vulnerable. Michele writes:
The woman pictured here was among the millions of Khmer displaced during Pol Pot’s collectivisation experiment which emptied Cambodia’s urban areas, created rural upheaval, and saw more than a quarter of the population die of starvation or disease or be executed under the guise of crimes against the state. More than 30 years on, as UN-sanctioned judges prepare to bring to trial (in early 2007) the few remaining Pol Pot cronies, many Khmers continue to face displacement. It’s not conflict they’re fleeing this time, but usually landlessness and land tenure disputes. Land grabbing from the poor and vulnerable by highly-ranked officials and well-placed government officials is a major concern. A lack of clear political process, political will (in some cases) to enforce the law, high levels of corruption, ambiguous land titling agreements and a lack of clarity of land rights complicates the process.











3 responses so far ↓
1 Michele L // Dec 9, 2006 at 5:15 pm
A story ran in the Asia Times on Dec 8 on Chinese investments in Cambodia’s remote south-eastern province of Mondolkiri. Appears to implicate Chinese investors in land grabbing, along with social and environmental shenanigans….
The url is:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/HL08Ae01.html
2 Deathpower in Cambodia » Blog Archive » Cambodian Landlessness // Dec 12, 2006 at 4:49 am
[...] Here. Posted by Erik Filed in cambodian news, State, Economics, land [...]
3 New Mandala » Cambodia land grab // Dec 17, 2006 at 9:07 pm
[...] Further to our recent story about land and displacement in Cambodia, an Australian ABC television report on the issue is available on Youtube. Thanks to Maylee for the link. [...]
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate but we reserve the right to reject or edit comments that contain material that is offensive, irrelevant, overly repetitious or involves personal attack rather than a discussion of the issues. And please avoid long quotes from other online sources - just provide the link!